Click Here To Return Home
Click To Go Home
 
 

Bible Study Outline
"Moses' Second Address: Warfare "
Deuteronomy 20:1-20
Lesson 20


 



 
This Study was written and submitted by: Joseph M. Willmouth, Pastor of Trinity Bible Church in Biloxi, Mississippi 39532. This contributed article is copyright protected, and the sole property of the contributing author.  It may be freely copied and used provided the above credits are included. Document expiration: indefinite. Dr Willmouth States, "These Outlines were prepared for our Sunday Evening Bible Study, as a 2 page handout (front & back), at Trinity Bible Church, Biloxi, Mississippi."
.
Notes
The webservant of bibleteacher.org began using these excellent studies in our local Bible study group. Any additional notes added by bibleteacher.org as a result of this independent study will be marked and enclosed by this type of table.  This way the original work of  Dr.  Willmouth will in no way be modified.
.

I. Preparations For Battle (vv.1-9).

1. Their spiritual preparation (vv.1-4).

A. The Israelites were not to be afraid when they approached large, heavily armed, armies because God was with them (v.4).
B. As they approached the battle field, the priest were to speak to them to prepare them for battle (vv.2-4).
1) The priests were expected to be on the battlefield in accordance with their theocratic government, in which everything was done directly by God through His delegated ministers (v.2).
A) It was the province of this priest to sound the trumpets (Numbers 10:9, 31:6).
B) They also had others under them who repeated at the head of each battalion the exhortations which he addressed to the warriors in general.
2) They were to remind the Israelites of four things (v.3).
A) Not to be fainthearted (rakak {raw-kak': v, hiphil, perf, 3 per, m, sg}; to be tender, soft or weak).
B) Not to be afraid (yare' {yaw-ray': adj, f, sg, construct}; to fear, revere, be afraid, to stand in awe of).
C) Not to be frightened (chaphaz {khaw-faz': v, niphal, part, m, sg, absolute}; to hurry, flee, be terrified, tremble, be alarmed).
D) Not to panic ('arats {aw-rats': v, hiphil, part, m, sg, construct; suffix: 2 per, m, pl}; to cause to tremble, terrify, feel dread).
3) They also were to prepare the army for battle by assuring the Israelites of the Lord's presence to fight their enemies and to give them victory (v.4).
Focal
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 20:1-4  "When thou goest out to battle against thine enemies, and seest horses, and chariots, and a people more than thou, be not afraid of them: for the LORD thy God is with thee, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. [2]  And it shall be, when ye are come nigh unto the battle, that the priest shall approach and speak unto the people, [3]  And shall say unto them, Hear, O Israel, ye approach this day unto battle against your enemies: let not your hearts faint, fear not, and do not tremble, neither be ye terrified because of them; [4]  For the LORD your God is he that goeth with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you."

As we read these verses we are again reminded that there are TWO MAJOR THEMES that run through Deuteronomy that are not highlighted in Exodus or Leviticus. 

1. The first theme is this: man is utterly weak, unable to accomplish any great and lasting thing in the sphere of his own strength. As the Lord addresses the people through Moses, it is obvious that He DOES NOT EXPECT the Israelite Army to win the battle for the Promised Land in their own power. No, the Land has already been given to Israel, this in itself an action of God's great Grace. The Israelites could neither earn nor deserve this land, but were to enter the Land submissive to the empowerment of God - Who would give them the victory.

The first generation of Israel stood at this same place and made excuses to Jesus as to why they could not enter the land. They failed to understand that God didn't expect them, in THEIR OWN POWER, to take the land. God expected Israel to LOVE Him and trust Him enough to cross over the Jordan, believing that the land was already theirs. This was, after all, the basis of their training over the last forty years. To Trust God, not like the first generation "trusted", with a conditional trust, a conditional love. To that first generation the Lord said:

SUPPORTING ~ Psalms 95:7-11 "For he is our God; and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand. To day if ye will hear his voice, [8]  Harden not your heart, as in the provocation, and as in the day of temptation in the wilderness: [9]  When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my work. [10]  Forty years long was I grieved with this generation, and said, It is a people that do err in their heart, and they have not known my ways: [11]  Unto whom I sware in my wrath that they should not enter into my rest."

This same Lord, the same Creator God took Israel to this same spot on the Jordan, and asked them "Trust Me, Believe Me - I Love You with an everlasting Love, and I have given the land to you. Just cross over, take it!" The First Generation rejected the Grace of God when they refused to cross over, and in rejecting His Grace they tempted, proved, and angered God. Jesus gave love, offered land by Grace - and was spurned as the people followed after a second love. Had they followed their first Love, the Lord Yeshua, they would have crossed the first time. They loved themselves more than Yeshua, more than the Lord their Creator - and the first generation lost out.

Here is a secret you need to take to heart, dear believers, to write on your heart, to keep foremost in your mind. We NEVER get to the place where we can stand on our own strength. In our arrogance we often forget that great truth, but be aware of this - Jesus never makes us so strong that we no longer need Him. We are continually dependent on our Lord for the strength to defeat our enemies. We are continually dependent on Him for the strength to make it through just one day in this evil age. King David understood this great truth when he wrote under the power of God's Spirit:

SUPPORTING ~ Psalms 30:4-10 "Sing unto the LORD, O ye saints of his, and give thanks at the remembrance of his holiness. [5]  For his anger endureth but a moment; in his favour is life: weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning. [6] And in my prosperity I said, I shall never be moved. [7]  LORD, by thy favour thou hast made my mountain to stand strong: thou didst hide thy face, and I was troubled. [8]  I cried to thee, O LORD; and unto the LORD I made supplication. [9]  What profit is there in my blood, when I go down to the pit? Shall the dust praise thee? shall it declare thy truth? [10]  Hear, O LORD, and have mercy upon me: LORD, be thou my helper."

The Israelites had their roots in slavery, in Egyptian bondage. They were NOT great soldiers, but were freed slaves. They had neither the training, nor the equipment to be a mighty army - but if they remained fixed, firmly fixed on their first Love - then and only then they would succeed in what God called them to do. As the Lord reminds us:

SUPPORTING ~ Philippians 4:13  "I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me."

When the Israelite Army and the modern day Christian realize our weakness, and in so realizing become totally dependent upon Jesus - then this is the secret to strength and success in this life! 

2. The Second Great Theme that these passages bring to our mind is that our Lord, regardless as to HOW WE MAY FEEL AT THIS MOMENT, is in a continual, abiding presence with His people. Deuteronomy 20.1 says:

"the LORD thy God is with thee",

And Deuteronomy 20.4 states:

"For the LORD your God is HE THAT GOETH WITH YOU, to fight FOR YOU against your enemies, to save you"

We, like the Israelites, often come up against seemingly insurmountable problems in our lives. Are you out of work? Out of money? Lonely? In despair? Are you sick, burdened? Does it seem like no one loves you, and you have no friends? Is your business in trouble?

The Israelites were coming up against seven nations, TRAINED nations, EQUIPPED nations, that were ready, willing, and able to do battle. Each and every Israelite who looked westward across the Jordan probably thought the same thing: I don't have it in me - I can't do this thing - I can't deal with this. The beauty of life with Jesus is .... He doesn't expect you to do it or deal with it. He expects you to surrender to Him! The Apostle Paul, one of the greatest men who ever lived for Jesus, gave us the "secret to his success". What was it?

SUPPORTING ~ 2 Corinthians 12:7-10 "And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure. [8]  For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me. [9]  And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. [10]  Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong."

Paul went to the Lord three times to have the "thorn in the flesh" removed from his life. What was this thorn? Some say it was Paul's eyesight, others claim it was something else, another physical ailment. The point is: WHO CARES what the thorn was? The answer is more important than the question. The answer is, "My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness". Jesus calls us all to a life of surrender to His will. He told the Israelites, "Go across the Jordan, do what I tell you, and you WILL possess the land". How is this different from what our Lord told Paul, "My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness". Not one iota different! When each and every one of us stops pretending that we are self sufficient and realize that ALL we have and hope to be, we HAVE FROM JESUS - then we are strong. When we realize:

SUPPORTING ~ Psalms 121:1-8 "I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help.[2]  My help cometh from the LORD, which made heaven and earth. [3]  He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber. [4]  Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. [5]  The LORD is thy keeper: the LORD is thy shade upon thy right hand. [6]  The sun shall not smite thee by day, nor the moon by night. [7]  The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil: he shall preserve thy soul. [8]  The LORD shall preserve thy going out and thy coming in from this time forth, and even for ever more."

The themes of man's weakness and God's abiding presence and strength are the keys to success for the Israelite Army - and for you, dear believer. After salvation we are not self sufficient, but are MORE dependent upon Jesus to live this new life He has wrought in us. We are not FREED from His commandments, but should all the more heed His Word, follow His lead, do EXACTLY what He says - knowing that, when the battle is the Lord's, and He fights for us, we WILL be victorious!

2. Dismissal From Service (vv.5-8).

A. The officers.
1) "Shoter" {sho-tare'}; "to write," "scribes" or "overseers" (Exodus 5:6).
2) They might be keepers of the muster-roll, or perhaps military heralds whose duty it was to announce the orders of the generals (2 Chronicles 26:11).
B. These officers were responsible for making sure that the army was composed of qualified men (v.5a).
1) Those most qualified were not necessarily the ones who were the most gifted for battle.
2) The qualified soldier was the one who wasn't distracted by circumstances or events that would hinder him from fighting as he ought too.
3) Israel did not have a conscription army.
C. The four reasons for exemption (vv.5b-8).
1) The dedication of a new house, which was an important event, and celebrated by festive and religious ceremonies (Nehemiah 12:27); the exemption was for a year (v.5b).
2) The planting of a vineyard (v.6).
- The fruit of the first three years being declared unfit for use, and the first-fruits producible on the fourth, the exemption in this case lasted at least four years.
3) The betrothal of a wife, which was always a considerable time before marriage (v.7).
4) Cowardice was also the grounds of exemption (v.8).
D. When the Israelites were ready for battle, commanders were appointed (v.9).
- Who was to do the appointing is not clear.
Focal
FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 20:5-9 "And the officers shall speak unto the people, saying, What man is there that hath built a new house, and hath not dedicated it? let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man dedicate it. [6]  And what man is he that hath planted a vineyard, and hath not yet eaten of it? let him also go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man eat of it. [7]  And what man is there that hath betrothed a wife, and hath not taken her? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man take her. [8]  And the officers shall speak further unto the people, and they shall say, What man is there that is fearful and fainthearted? let him go and return unto his house, lest his brethren's heart faint as well as his heart. [9]  And it shall be, when the officers have made an end of speaking unto the people, that they shall make captains of the armies to lead the people."

Now that the priests have spiritually prepared the Israelites for battle, it is up to the "officers", {shoter [sho-tare'], scribes} to make sure that the army was made up of the MOST QUALIFIED men. In God's Army the most qualified are NOT those who have technical competence, leadership abilities, or some specialty in a chosen career field. No, the war that Israel was going to fight would be empowered by God - it was His war. As such, no "skilled" people were needed. Who then were the ones who were "qualified" to be in the Army of God? Only those who LOVED and were DEVOTED to the Lord God Almighty. Says Matthew Henry:

"In the wars wherein Israel engaged according to the will of God, they might expect the Divine assistance. The Lord was to be their only confidence. In these respects they were types of the Christian's warfare. Those unwilling to fight, must be sent away. The unwillingness might arise from a man's outward condition. God would not be served by men forced against their will. Thy people shall be willing, Psalms 110:3. In running the Christian race, and fighting the good fight of faith, we must lay aside all that would make us unwilling. If a man's unwillingness rose from weakness and fear, he had leave to return from the war. The reason here given is, lest his brethren's heart fail as well as his heart. We must take heed that we fear not with the fear of them that are afraid, Isaiah 8:12."

Our Lord Jesus said it another way:

SUPPORTING ~ Luke 9:57-62 "And it came to pass, that, as they went in the way, a certain man said unto him, Lord, I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest. [58]  And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head. [59]  And he said unto another, Follow me. But he said, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. [60]  Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach the kingdom of God. [61]  And another also said, Lord, I will follow thee; but let me first go bid them farewell, which are at home at my house. [62]  And Jesus said unto him, No man, having put his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God."

The man who would follow the Lord YAHWEH into battle against the combined might of Canaan MUST have NO DISTRACTIONS. His eyes must be firmly fixed on the Author of his salvation. Men were exempted from the Army if they ....

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 20:5  "... What man is there that hath built a new house, and hath not dedicated it? let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man dedicate it."

Dedicating a new house was considered a reason for exemption from military service. In Israel, dedication of a new house was usually accompanied by festive ceremonies. Though the new homeowner was not INDEFINITELY excluded from service in Israel's Army, God was giving Israel the Promised Land as a gift ... and He wanted to encourage them to work with Him in making this gift usable. Building and dedicating new houses in the Promised Land was therefore a very valid reason for exclusion, albeit temporary, from military service.

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 20:6  "And what man is he that hath planted a vineyard, and hath not yet eaten of it? let him also go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man eat of it."

Again, God was giving Israel the Promised Land so that they could LIVE AND PROSPER in it. For the Israelite, the vineyard was a necessary part of the home. Though the person who was planting new vineyards was not indefinitely excluded from military service, he was excluded until the vineyards had begun to produce. Since the newly planted vineyard takes up to four years to properly produce fruit, the man who planted the vineyard could expect to be excluded from military service for up to 4 years.

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 20:7  "And what man is there that hath betrothed a wife, and hath not taken her? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man take her."

And finally, the man who was newly married, but who had not yet consummated the marriage, was excluded from military service. God was giving Israel the Promised Land so they would marry, have children, and expand as a nation - as He had promised Abraham. The Lord did not want to take newly married men who, truth be told, had their minds on each of their wives, and take these men to battle. No, their donation to the push for the Promised Land was to consummate their marriages, reproduce in fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant - and after this, they would be expected to serve in His Army.

Building homes, planting vineyards, marrying and having children - this was the REASON that Yeshua was giving the Promised Land to Israel. Without these things, war had no meaning, no value. So these three reasons were HONORABLE and VALID reasons why a man would be released from military service - for a time, anyway.

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 20:8  "... What man is there that is fearful and fainthearted? let him go and return unto his house, lest his brethren's heart faint as well as his heart."

Yet here was one more reason to avoid military service in Israel, and that was if a man was "fearful and fainthearted", or {yare' [yaw-ray'], filled with fear} + {rak, weak, tender}. Cowards were to be rejected from God's Army outright lest they pollute the minds of their fellow soldiers, and thus cause the Army to fall. God's injunction against cowardice was NOT made until after the priests reminded the people that THE WAR WAS GOD'S WAR, and that, as long as they KEPT THEIR EYES ON HIM, then they WOULD SUCCEED.

Cowardice in this passage is therefore recognized as a SPIRITUAL problem. The man who has allowed fear to motivate his behavior rather than the love of God in his heart - this man has ceased believing in the Creator and has started to believe that the circumstances that surround him are greater than God.

Listen believer - there are two viewpoints: a Divine Viewpoint, and the human (sometimes "politically correct") viewpoint. Jesus tells us that we are not to approach life by merging our way of life with the human viewpoint that swirls, like sewage, all around us. We are to seek out and follow after the Lord's viewpoint on everything:

SUPPORTING ~ Isaiah 55:7-9 "Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. [8]  For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. [9]  For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."

God alone knows what is best for us - Jesus alone can see all of history unveiled, like a banner, whereas we can only see small portions of that overall picture. His thoughts are greater than ours, His ways are mightier than ours - thus we are called to follow Him wherever He leads. We are not called to look at the situation (as the first generation of Israel did) and, once weighing out the pros and cons, decide whether or not we will do as He has commanded. NO! We are, like children at the dinner table, not to question His provision. Just to "go and do" as He has commanded.

Our focus in this life determines how we live our lives. When we are focused on Jesus, eternal God in the flesh, our Savior and Lord, then we know that we shall triumph as long as we follow His Word. The Scripture tells us:

SUPPORTING ~ 2 Timothy 1:7  "For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind."

How can we have fear, when He has said "Pass over yonder Jordan, for the battle is Mine, and I HAVE given it to you"? The Israelite's heritage was not only the Land, but they also had the heritage of "power, and of love, and of a sound mind". When King Darius of the Medo-Persian Empire was tricked by pride and false supporters into signing the decree forbidding Daniel to pray, Daniel prayed anyway. The morning after he was cast into the Lion's Den Daniel came out unharmed, saying:

SUPPORTING ~ Daniel 6:22-23 "My God hath sent his angel, and hath shut the lions' mouths, that they have not hurt me: forasmuch as before him innocency was found in me; and also before thee, O king, have I done no hurt." [23]  Then was the king exceeding glad for him, and commanded that they should take Daniel up out of the den. So Daniel was taken up out of the den, and no manner of hurt was found upon him, because HE BELIEVED IN HIS GOD."

Joseph, sold into slavery by his own brothers, kept his eyes on the Lord his Savior and, because of this:

SUPPORTING ~ Acts 7:9-10 "... but God was with him, [10] And delivered him out of all his afflictions, and gave him favor and wisdom in the sight of Pharaoh king of Egypt; and he made him governor over Egypt and all his house."

The Scripture is full of the testimony of Him who cannot lie, Who has delivered - over and over again - those who have kept their eyes on Him. When we who have accepted Jesus as Savior come to the realization that Christianity is not mere morality, but is a FAITH that produces a RELATIONSHIP with GOD OUR SAVIOR, a relationship that relies on Him and His Word like a drowning man relies on a life preserver. When we become focused on Him, the Author and Finisher of our Faith, as the Book of Hebrews tells us:

SUPPORTING ~ Hebrews 12:1-3 "Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, [2]  Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God. [3]  For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds."

The coward in Israel was the one who had forgotten who his Strength and Salvation was. Thus the coward, who was, in reality, a backslidden believer, was released from serving in the Army of God. God's Army in Israel did not need great numbers. God counts hearts, not heads, when He wants a great work accomplished. He wants a people obedient to Him, to His message, to His will, totally reliant on Him.

Application: As Israel entered into the Promised Land, they were entering as soldiers. Compared to the world's standard, they were little more than a ill-equipped mob. But unlike the world, they were to be armed with the most powerful force in the world; faith. God didn't want Israel to take the Promised Land by their might, but instead He wanted them to learn to trust in Him for their victories. As Christians, we are told in Ephesians 6:10-20 that we are also in a war; that is a spiritual war. And like the Israelites, if we are going have victories in our walk, then we are going to have to put our trust in God and not ourselves.

II. Orders For The Taking Of Cities (vv.10-20).

1. Cities outside of Israel's borders (vv.10-15).

A. When the Israelites approached a city that was outside their borders they were to first offer terms of peace (v.10).
B. If the city accepted Israel's terms and opened their gates, they were to become a work force for the Israelites (v. 11).
C. Cities that refused the peace offer (vv.12-15).
1) The city would be taken and the men were to be executed (vv.12-13).
2) The women, the children, the livestock, and everything else in the city were to become booty for Israel (vv.14-15).
2. Cities inside of Israel's borders (vv.16-20).
A. The cities that were within Canaan proper were subject to "total destruction." (vv.16-17).
1) Everything that breathes was to be destroyed (v.16).
2) All the inhabitants that remained in the conquered cities of Canaan were to be completely destroyed (v.17).
B. The reason for this total destruction was to prevent the Israelites from being enticed into the supreme sin of defecting from the Lord and turning to the worship of other gods (v.18).
C. During prolonged sieges the Israelites would need wood for various purposes, both for military works and for fuel (vv.19-20).
1) Only fruit bearing trees were to be carefully spared because of their long term food benefits (v.19).
2) All other non fruit bearing (non eatable) could be cut down and used for siege implements (v.20).


Application: God's purpose of destroying everything that lived inside of the Promised Land's borders, wasn't a cruel act of a mean and wrathful God of the Old Testament. Instead, was an act of a loving God who was protecting His children from being infected by the sin of idolatry. God wanted the small nation of Israel to have a chance to grow and to be a holy nation that showed the lost world the glory of God. Sometimes we may not be able understand why God allows certain things to happen in our world, but we must never lose sight of the fact that "...all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose." (Romans 8:28; KJV)



On Your Own: Review this chapter at a later time and ask yourself the following questions to see if there are other applications for us to apply in our walk with the Lord. Is there an example for me to follow? Is there a sin for me to avoid? Is there a command for me to obey? Is there a promise for me to claim? Is there a difficulty here for me to explore (more research needed)? Is there something in this passage that I should pray about today? What does this passage teach me about God, Jesus, and/or the Holy Spirit? ("How To Give Away Your Faith" by Paul E. Little, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL., pp.126-27, 1980)
 
 



Bible Study Outline
"Moses' Second Address: Unsolved Homicides, & Family Life"
Deuteronomy 21:1-21
Lesson 21

by Joseph M. Willmouth
These Outlines were prepared for our Sunday Evening Bible Study, as a 2 page handout (front & back -- & sometimes a little longer), at
Trinity Bible Church, Biloxi, Mississippi.

I Unsolved Homicide (21:1-9).
 
Focal

Unsolved Homicides

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 21:1-4  "If one be found slain in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee to possess it, lying in the field, and it be not known who hath slain him: [2]  Then thy elders and thy judges shall come forth, and they shall measure unto the cities which are round about him that is slain: [3]  And it shall be, that the city which is next unto the slain man, even the elders of that city shall take an heifer, which hath not been wrought with, and which hath not drawn in the yoke; [4]  And the elders of that city shall bring down the heifer unto a rough valley, which is neither eared nor sown, and shall strike off the heifer's neck there in the valley.  [5]  And the priests the sons of Levi shall come near; for them the LORD thy God hath chosen to minister unto him, and to bless in the name of the LORD; and by their word shall every controversy and every stroke be tried: [6]  And all the elders of that city, that are next unto the slain man, shall wash their hands over the heifer that is beheaded in the valley: [7]  And they shall answer and say, Our hands have not shed this blood, neither have our eyes seen it. [8]  Be merciful, O LORD, unto thy people Israel, whom thou hast redeemed, and lay not innocent blood unto thy people of Israel's charge. And the blood shall be forgiven them. [9]  So shalt thou put away the guilt of innocent blood from among you, when thou shalt do that which is right in the sight of the LORD."

As we have studied before, God our Creator considers all life sacred, a gift from Him, and as such man is FORBIDDEN to take the life of another human being without the consent of the Giver of Life, God.  This is not an issue tinged with gray for our Lord .... He considers the taking of life an abomination, the act of a twisted human being, and EXPECTS that each and every murder will be PAID FOR or recognized as an abomination by His people Israel. In Deuteronomy 21, the Lord tells the Israelites what they must do if they find a murdered person and "it be not known who hath slain him" (vvs 1). In other words, a murder is discovered and, after the elders and the judges research the crime and can find no one GUILTY PARTY, then they are to take the following steps:

1. The "elders and thy judges shall come forth" (vvs 2), that is, the leaders of Israel's justice system would publicly present themselves, and
2. They "shall measure unto the cities which are round about him that is slain" (vvs 2). They would measure the distance from the dead body to the established cities in Israel. Whichever city was CLOSEST to the dead body would then:
3. Have their local Law Enforcement (elders and priests) take a good, unused heifer - one that has not  "been wrought with, and which hath not drawn in the yoke" (vvs 3), and 
4. Take that heifer down to an untilled, unworked valley to sacrifice it to God.

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 21.4  "And the elders of that city shall bring down the heifer unto a rough valley, (nachal {nakh'-al}, a water course, stream bed)  which is neither eared nor sown, and shall strike off ( `araph {aw-raf'}. This word does mean to "cut off or decapitate", but in the Qal stem (as it is here) it means "to break") the heifer's neck there in the valley. "

5. When the elders sacrificed the heifer, they were to "strike off the heifer's neck", or break it's neck in an unworked valley near a source of water. 

Why go through all these steps, especially since the elders of the city nearest the murder victim would have probably been guiltless of the crime? There were several reasons. First, as the Scripture has taught us repeatedly,  human life is a gift from God. If blood is unjustly spilt through the action of murder, God considered this to be so horrible that this act, in His eyes, "polluted the land":

SUPPORTING ~ Numbers 35:32-34  "And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest.  [33]  So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.  [34]  Defile not therefore the land which ye shall inhabit, wherein I dwell: for I the LORD dwell among the children of Israel."

In God's government no-one "got away" with murder.  God's Law was designed to GRAPHICALLY TEACH the Children of Israel the truths of God. If a person was murdered and his murderer unknown, to God this made no difference. HE knew who the murderer was, but rather than point out the murderer God designed a ritual that showed all of Israel how evil He considered the act to be.

In the ritual sacrifice of the heifer, the animal was NOT CUT with the ceremonial knife while tied to the altar of God. The sacrifice that was being made was a BLOODLESS sacrifice, thus the action did NOT atone for the sin of the murder. The Bible teaches:

SUPPORTING ~ Hebrews 9:18-22  "Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood. [19]  For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people, [20]  Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you. [21]  Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry. [22]  And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission."

"without shedding of blood is no remission". The sin of this murder could NOT be atoned for by the people, for the Lord had previously told in His Word that:

SUPPORTING ~ Genesis 9:5-6 "And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. [6]  Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."

Sin could be atoned for, at least ritually and temporally, under God's Law by the shedding of animal blood. But for the spilling of human blood, there was no provision of atonement in God's Law BUT the act of spilling the blood of the murderer.  The heifer's neck was broken to show the Israelite that the murderer, once found, would STILL have to pay for his evil act by forfeiting his life under the Lex Talionis. 

The unworked heifer, fresh stream, and uncultivated valley in the ritual emphasize purity -- that is, these things are uncontaminated and are free from human tampering. The elders of the city nearest the corpse were to "wash their hands over the heifer" (vvs 6) that had it's neck broken, signifying that they were innocent of the sin of murder. This ritual was VERY necessary for, if the Blood Avenger (the nearest living relative to the slain person) was present, then it WOULD BE POSSIBLE for the Blood Avenger to enact God's Vengeance against the leaders of the city. By washing their hands over the sacrifice the elders vowed before God that they, and as far as they knew, their city, was guiltless of this crime.  Dr. Willmouth states, in this study guide:

"The breaking of the heifer's neck symbolized that the crime deserved capital punishment."

Dr. John Maxwell states {Mastering The OT, pg. 249}, 

"The killing of the heifer was not an expiatory sacrifice, for blood was not sprinkled according to standard rituals. Since the procedure was a compromise solution, it must be assumed that if the murderer were subsequently found, he would bear his own guilt. But if not, inner city strife was avoided since the Avenger of Blood could not rashly demand satisfaction from men of another city."

There is an interesting parallel found between the ritual sacrifice of the heifer and the trial of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Though none of Jesus' bones were broken,  when our Lord was led before the Procurator  of Judea, Pontius Pilate, He was beaten with a scourge and tried - and yet found guiltless by Pilate.  The Scripture tells us that:

SUPPORTING ~ Matthew 27:22-25  "Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. [23]  And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified. [24]  When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it. [25]  Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children."

Pilate could find no fault with Jesus, no reason to crucify Him, but he bowed to political pressure and allowed Jesus to be crucified anyway.  Pilate, a wise though somewhat malleable ruler, used the Jewish ritual by, from his balcony, "washing his hands" over Jesus, who would soon be crucified. By his action Pilate sought to expunge his own guilt and Rome's guilt (which he represented) in taking an innocent person's life. Though Pilate washed his hands over Jesus, God judged BOTH Rome and the Jewish nation for the spilling of our Lord's innocent blood. That spilling was necessary for the atonement of our sins - but the means of its spilling was a violation of both God's as well as Rome's Laws.  Jerusalem, that great City of David, would be destroyed in just a few more years. Dr. F.F. Bruce in his book, "New Testament History", writes:

"Titus [the eldest son of the emperor of Rome] began the siege of Jerusalem in April, 70 [AD]. The defenders held out desperately for five months, but by the end of August the Temple area was occupied and the holy house burned down, and by the end of September all resistance in the city had come to an end.  [The last stronghold to fall after this was Masada].  ... the defenders of which held out until April or May, 73 [AD], and, when they saw that no hope was left, committed mass suicide rather than fall into the hands of the conquerors".

The Jews were effectively dispersed as a nation, as they were punished for their part in the Cross. Yet do not think that the Jews alone were held responsible and Pilate escaped blame by "washing his hands".  In 36 AD Pilate was ordered back to Rome to stand trial for cruelty and oppression, particularly on the charge that he executed men without proper trial.... according to a 4th century tradition, Pilate killed himself on orders from Emperor Caligula in 39 AD. {Source, Encyclopedia Britannica}. Though it was necessary for our Lord to die for our sins, the Eternal Creator has established the truth forever that life is sacred - and may not be taken unless He who gave it orders it, or in response to punishing a criminal for committing murder. 

1. This section discusses the procedures to be followed when someone discovered a murder victim with no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding their death (v.1).

A. When murder or manslaughter has been committed the justice of God has been openly defied (Num 35:32-33).
B. There is an identification of the criminal with both the land and the people, and unless the criminal is punished, justice is not met.
1) When the perpetrator of the crime cannot be detected, some method of removal of the guilt that then falls on the land and people must be secured.
2) An examples of this occurred in the experience at Ai (Josh 9) and that of Saul's slaughter of certain Gibeonites (2 Sam 21).
3) The personal guilt of a murderer cannot be readily removed. (Num. 35:33).
2. The procedures (vv.2-9).
A. First they had to determine the closest town or city (v.2).
B. The town that was the closest, its elders and judges were to take an heifer, that has never been worked, to a valley with running water, and break it's neck (vv.3-4).
- The breaking of the heifer's neck symbolized that the crime deserved capital punishment.
C. The priest would then give a liturgy that was repeated by the elders (v.5).
1) The priests needed to be present, because they had been given authority and responsibility to decide difficult cases of dispute and assault.
2) Moreover, they represented the Lord (10:8; 18:5).
D. The elders would then wash their hands over the heifer, which symbolized the community's freedom from guilt attached to the crime, and was a public testimony of their innocence (v.6).
E. The elders would then, in behalf of all Israel, pray for atonement from God (vv.7-9).
1) They prayed that the Lord's redeemed people would be held guiltless.
2) Though the word kapar ("atone") appears twice in v. 8, the atonement mentioned is not an atonement within the sacrificial system, but rather an atonement for justice.
- The heifer suffered death in place of the unknown criminal, in order to clear the land of guilt.
3) This action purged the people from the guilt of spilling innocent blood (v. 9).
Application: This regulation has two important focuses; the realization of the seriousness of the pollution of sin, and the grace of God that offers the means for the removal of that sin. This passage also demonstrates how valuable God considers life. Another issue raised here is the question of corporate guilt. When we as a society ignore the moral laws of God, can we expect to be forgiven or be exempt from God's judgment on our society? The book of Isaiah opens with a prayer of forgiveness for cooperate sins of Israel, as Christians shouldn't we do likewise? (1 Tim.2:1-2; 1 Peter 2:11-17).

II. Family Life (21:10-21).

1. Marrying captive women of war (21:10-14).

A. An Israelite was permitted to marry a woman who was taken captive during war (vv.10-11).
1) They had to come from a city outside of their land (20:14-15).
2) They could not be a Canaanite woman since they were prohibited from marrying them (7:1, 3-4).
3) If the Israelite soldier genuinely desired her, he could only have her though marriage.
A) This protected her dignity and the purity of the soldier.
B) Israelites were not to rape, plunder, or mistreat captives as other armies of the ancient Near East did (22:25-29).
Focal

Marrying Captives

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 21:10-14  "When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,  [11]  And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;  [12]  Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;  [13]  And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.  [14]  And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her."

When the Israelites went to war in the Promised Land they were under a strict CODE OF CONDUCT as to how they were to conduct themselves. It was common practice among many of the Near Eastern nations to rape and/or mistreat captives. Even as recent as the Second World War, it came to light during the "War Crimes Trials" that Japanese officers allowed and often encouraged poor treatment of prisoners of war. Why this is, I honestly do not know - but I do know that God established a policy amongst His people that THERE WOULD BE NO TORTURE of captives. This type of behavior is incompatible with the Grace of God. In fact, the Israelite men were ALLOWED to intermarry with captured women AS LONG AS they were not of Canaan:

SUPPORTING ~ Deuteronomy 7:1- 3  "When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;  {these nations were all related to Canaan} [2]  And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: [3]  Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son."

The Israelites were NOT allowed to intermarry with the descendants of Canaan, but were commanded by God to DESTROY all Canaanites - men, women, children - wherever they were found. This was because the Canaanites had moved far away from God and into idolatry and child sacrifice - and He did not want Israel infected by this same disease. So this passage in Deuteronomy 21 does not apply to intermarriage with the Canaanites, but to women OTHER than those of Canaan.

IF a woman was taken captive in battle, and IF she was not a Canaanite, then there were certain procedures that the soldier had to follow before marrying her:

Deuteronomy 21.12a   "...  thou shalt bring her home to thine house ..."

The woman was brought home - though not touched by the soldier at this time. She was given an opportunity to get used to her surroundings, to make that home her own. This was to bring her a sense of security and identity. 

Deuteronomy 21.12b  "... she shall shave her head, and pare her nails ..."

In many Eastern cultures the hair and the nails were often lavishly decorated by the women to please the man or the ethnic culture. When a woman was brought into God's Theocracy of Israel from another country, SHE was to willingly shave her head and trim her nails. This served four purposes: it gave the woman a fresh start in the new culture of Israel, it gave the woman a clean break from her past, it symbolized a time of ritual purification and mourning for the loss of her family, and by HER ACTION of shaving and paring she was demonstrating her willingness to become a part of Israelite society. This shaving of the hair and trimming of the nails is related to the Scripture that follows:

Deuteronomy 21.13 "... she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month ..."

The woman was given a reasonable period of time, one month, to mourn the loss of her family. Only after this period of time was the man allowed to approach the woman and, if both parties were agreeable, consummate the marriage.  If the woman or the man rejected the marriage, then the man was to allow her to go her own way:

Deuteronomy 21.14 ... "then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her ..."

NOT to treat her as a slave, nor a prostitute, but as a person with worth - for we are all created in the Image of God, and life is PRECIOUS to our Lord.

B. The conditions of marriage (vv.12-14).
1) The woman was first brought to the Israelite soldier's home (v.12a).
2) Her head was to be shaved and her nails trimmed (v.12b).
3) Her clothes that she was wearing, when she was taken captive, were thrown away (v.13a).
4) She was given one month to mourn for her parents (v.13b).
5) When all the above conditions were met, then the man could take her as his wife (v.13c).
C. Divorce was permitted if the marriage did not work out (v.14).
1) If the new wife refused to accept her new husband's values, then the husband could dissolve the marriage.
2) The man was forbidden to treat her as a slave, so she was able to keep some measure of dignity by the divorce.


Application: Sometimes what is pleasing to the eyes isn't always pleasing to our lives. We see here in these verses that beauty is only skin deep, because in some cases it stopped there. Unless the heart of one of these captive women was willing to follow the God of Israel, there would be no happiness, and would be followed by broken hearts and a broken marriage. While God protected these captive woman from harm, He did not force them to believe in or trust in Him. This is why it is important that we select the person that we want to marry, we do not do so according to their outward appearance, but according to their heart for the Lord (2 Cor.6:14-16).

2. The rights of the first born (21:15-17).

A. This law protests the rights of the first born son of a man that has more than one wife (v.15a).
1) Monogamy was always God's plan for marriage in the Old Testament (Gen.2:20-24).
2) Polygamy was practiced by some, but not all, and never appears in a positive light in the Old Testament.
A) One reason would be because of jealously.
B) Polygamy and divorce were permitted in Israel because of the "hardness of men's hearts" (Matt.19:3-9).
C) The first polygamist was Lamech, who was a rebel against God (Gen.4:19).
Focal

Stability In The Home

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 21:15-17 "If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated: [16]  Then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn: [17]  But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his."

Our text starts out, "If a man have two wives", and I guess that's the best place to start. There are many cultic groups who have taken the Eastern tradition of the "Harem", or marriage to more than one wife, and have tried to say that this type of behavior is acceptable before God. Let me make this clear: In the Garden of Eden, the blueprint for marriage was that there be ONE man and ONE wife:

SUPPORTING ~ Genesis 2:21-24 "And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; [22]  And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. [23]  And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. [24]  Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."

The Lord Jesus made ONE WOMAN to go with the ONE MAN. He didn't make two women, or three, or ten, or a thousand - but one.  Adam recognized this principle as a part of Divine Design when he said (vvs 24) "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh".  God designed man and woman to be monogamous, not polygamous.  The Bible, in fact, never portrays polygamy in a positive way, but the man is always seen as henpecked - at his wits end. Consider Abraham who, at the suggestion of Sarah, produced a child through his servant Hagar. That child, Ishmael, grew up to father the Arabic Nations - which are even today in bitter dispute with the children of Promise through Isaac. Jacob went in to Rachel and loved her more than Leah, his other wife (Genesis 29:30). God, in compassion and mercy, allowed Leah to have the firstborn child, Reuben, then Simeon, Levi, and Judah - which caused Rachel to hate her sister Leah. Since Rachel could not bear children, she demanded that Jacob father children through her servant Bilhah - any by this strange proxy she bore children. Before these two sisters were done, they had all but killed Jacob in childbearing!

No, these verses in Deuteronomy do NOT condone polygamy, though they do recognize that such a situation DID EXIST in Israel and, if this situation exists, THEN God expected the FIRSTBORN of the wives, regardless as to which wife the husband loved more, to receive the "double portion of all that he hath" in inheritance.  Regardless as to whether man ignored God's Divine Design for marriage (which, by the way, always brought self induced misery on all the parties involved), God expected justice and stability to be maintained in the family. The eldest son, no matter which wife the husband loved best, MUST receive his due: a double portion of the inheritance, control of the family matters on the death of the Patriarch, preferential treatment and respect within the society of Israel.  The only exception to this has been according to God's sovereignty when He set aside the firstborn of the family to bless the younger son, such as in the case of Jacob and Esau (Romans 9.13) and Ephraim and Manasseh :

SUPPORTING ~ Genesis 48:17-19  "And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father's hand, to remove it from Ephraim's head unto Manasseh's head. [18]  And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. [19]  And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations."

God, who is the Potter, has the right to make that decision - but sinful man, living in unrighteous polygamy contrary to God's design, had no right to choose the Firstborn based on which wife he loved better. To do so was unjust, evil, and tore at the stability of the family in Israel.

B. The husband was forbidden to disregard his firstborn son rights due to his love for another wife above that of the first born son's mother (vv.15b-17).
1) The accounts of Jacob, Leah, and Rachel show how custom and favoritism could affect life in the polygamous family (Gen 29:15-30:24).
2) In Israel the responsibilities and privileges of the firstborn stayed with the firstborn regardless of the father's desires.
A) A father was not to make a will to circumvent this law or to dispose of his property (v.16).
(1) The first born son would inherit a double portion of the estate.
- He would often would privileges over other family members (Gen.27:1-4, 35-37).
- He would often receive preferential treatment (Gen.43:33).
- He would often receive respect of others (Gen.37:22).
(2) If there were two sons, the oldest son received 2/3s and youngest son 1/3.
(3) Nothing could change this law, not ever the husband's love for his favorite wife.
B) The first son, was the first sign of his father's strength, describes the son as the first result of the father's procreative power (v.17).
C) The only exception to this has been according to God's sovereignty when He set aside the firstborn of the family to bless the younger son, but this was God's right and not man's; Example: Jacob and Esau; Ephraim and Manasseh.


Application: The most important things in our lives are not always our wants or desires. The most important thing to God is that we do what is right according to his will. Sometimes this means we will struggle with our heart's desire, and our desire to do God's will. While we may not always understand God's reasoning, we can understand that we need to obey His Word.

3. Dealing with rebellious sons (21:18-21).

A. In cases where there was an extreme violation the 5th commandment, "honor your father and mother," (5:16; Ex.20:12), that son was to be punished by death (v.18).
1) This doesn't seem to apply to an occasional lapse of disobedience, but a persistent rebellion against a person's parents after they had be warned of the consequences of their rebellious actions.
Focal

Stability And The Errant Child

FOCAL ~ Deuteronomy 21:18-21 "If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: [19] Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; [20]  And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. [21]  And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear."

Though these seem to be some EXTREME verses (for, after all, who among us could take our child - even if he were rebellious - to the gates of the city to be put to death?), they do emphasize the fact that God considers the STABILITY of the family to be the foundation of a strong and stable nation.  Before we go off the deep end looking at these verses, we do need to consider this:

1. The verses did not refer to the child who occasionally fell into disobedience, but a child who persisted in rebellion - even though he or she had been warned. The text says, "when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them" (vv. 18). This was an extreme violation the 5th commandment, "honor your father and mother," (5:16; Ex.20:12).  The child was called "stubborn", carar {saw-rar': v, qal, part, f, sg, absolute}; to rebel, be stubborn, be rebellious, stubborn, "total rebellion", and  "rebellious", marah {maw-raw': n, common, f, sg, construct}; to be contentious, be disobedient towards, provocative, "to provoke by defiance."

2. This Law, though given, seems to have been given for it's DETERRENT EFFECT. I can find no instance in either the Scripture, or in the writings of the early historians (such as Josephus) where this punishment was exercised. The fear of death that this Law held over the children apparently kept any from falling away and into such apostasy. 

3. Was this Law excessive? God didn't think so, so neither can I. The strength of a nation lies in its stable families, and as the family goes, so goes the nation. Though I support prayer (at least silent prayer) in the school, prayer and Bible Study is needed MUCH MORESO in the home. For too long families have relaxed and expected the government to train and educate our children. Governments can and do have a hand in training the child - in Israel, the out of control child was punished by the governing Law of Israel. But governments cannot do it all - the parent and grandparent MUST be actively involved in teaching their children that there IS a Jesus, that He is NOT a myth, that HELL is a real place, and that there is SALVATION only by believing on and calling on the name of Jesus.  As our families bond to Christ and His Word,  this nation will stabilize and become stronger. If not - look for rough times ahead. As Dr. Willmouth states, "The greatest deterrent to crime in a society is the fear of punishment. The greatest deterrent to sin in a Israelite's life was the fear of the Lord. The greatest deterrent to sin in a Christian's life is their love for the Lord (John 14:15; 2 John 2:3; 5:2-3)."

A) "stubborn," carar {saw-rar': v, qal, part, f, sg, absolute}; to rebel, be stubborn, be rebellious, stubborn, "total rebellion"
B) "rebellious," marah {maw-raw': n, common, f, sg, construct}; to be contentious, be disobedient towards, provocative, "to provoke by defiance."
2) This verse shows that the parents have made repeated attempts to instruct their son, but he refuses to listen and obey (v.18).
B. Procedures for handling the rebellious son (vv.19-21).
1) The father and mother were to take the rebellious son to the elders at the main gate of their town (v.19).
A) This was the place where the law was administered (22:15; Josh.20:4; Job 29:7).
B) The elders were required to make an impartial judgment.
2) The parents would state the reason for bringing their son before the elders (v.19).
3) If the son was found to be guilty of rebellion, he was to be stoned to death by the men of the town (v.21).
A) This was to be a deterrent to others committing this sin in the land.
B) There is no record of this being done (in the Bible of other references), so it appears that the fear of death apparently deterred Jewish sons from being rebellious.
Application: The greatest deterrent to crime in a society is the fear of punishment. The greatest deterrent to sin in a Israelite's life was the fear of the Lord. The greatest deterrent to sin in a Christian's life is their love for the Lord (John 14:15; 2 John 2:3; 5:2-3).



On Your Own: Review this chapter at a later time and ask yourself the following questions to see if there are other applications for us to apply in our walk with the Lord. Is there an example for me to follow? Is there a sin for me to avoid? Is there a command for me to obey? Is there a promise for me to claim? Is there a difficulty here for me to explore (more research needed)? Is there something in this passage that I should pray about today? What does this passage teach me about God, Jesus, and/or the Holy Spirit? ("How To Give Away Your Faith" by Paul E. Little, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL., pp.126-27, 1980)